hckrnws
Tell HN: OpenAI $500 ProMax plan listed in API
by GustavHartz
https://chatgpt.com/backend-anon/checkout_pricing_config/con...
by GustavHartz
https://chatgpt.com/backend-anon/checkout_pricing_config/con...
Ask HN: How do you feel about the new $500 OpenAI subscription? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49838409 - Sept 2026 (8 comments)
So I would still prefer to spend some dollars in Anthropic or even Cursor solutions, which work much better as cloud dev envs.
It can feel unlimited for many use cases, probably. But I doubt it can, let's say, 3D model things in blender on 3 different computers for 24/7. And hey, why not 30 things? 300? If you're just watching them, it's easy to get ridiculous.
But gpt-6-sol, for instance, dropped price for the same level of intelligence. That will keep happening, and someday we'll have basically-free sol. And hopefully by then, very cheap astra.
But some new wild thing will be very expensive.
I'm sure I'll figure out how to use the new one, but I would be extremely happy with near-free Astra.
[dead]
A token misfired
It gets into a "define unlimited" discussion. You could give "unlimited" usage, but still "limit" both concurrency and throttle speed. Even if you run 24/7, they still have knobs they can twist.
The limiting thing now is total tokens, so unlimited would mean infinite tokens.
And it's not hard to spin up to infinite tokens, one agent and one command can orchestrate it.
I'm thinking the persistent agent is something that can't scale to multiple agents. Imagine only one agent you can invoke as many times as you want on a single account, but it cannot invoke subagents or scale itself. It's just always there ready to do work when you need it. But it behaves as "one".
This would be trivial to implement. Of course, if you have the money, you can have multiple $500 subscriptions and have multiple persistent agents.
it didn't exist 100 years ago
adapt